Dr. Christina J. Johns
I Love Trouble (1947-48)
I LOVE TROUBLE (1947)
Starring Franchot Tone (43 at the time), Janet Blair, Adele Jergens and a small part for Raymond Burr.
Directed by S. Sylvan Simon.
Music by George Duning
Costumes (gowns) by Jean Louis
This is a long movie (2 hours) but well worth the watch. It is the studio’s try out of Franchot Tone’s for a private detective series. While Tone is usually fun to watch, I don’t think he has the same sort of edge as the noir detective Dick Powell had or the charm of William Powell.
As most of the reviewers point out, this script is straight out of the Chandler/Hammett line of novels with the suave, wisecracking detective, but it is well worth watching.
My favorite lines from the film are:
Heavy: This is a gun in your back.
Tone: Yeah, I’ve seen one before.
The filmscript was written by Roy Huggins and was based on his novel “The Double Take.” This same character, Stuart Bailey, was played years later by Efrem Zimalist Jr. in the television series 77 Sunset Strip.
Huggins created a number of the most famout TV movie series - Maverick, The Fugitive, The Rockford Files, and 77 Sunset Strip.
I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. I did, however, stop it at one point and noticed that there was an hour and 8 minutes more to go. I was surprised. Some of the reviewers criticized the movie for the length, but it held my attention throughout.
It’s a bit amazing that the film does hold the attention since the plot is as one reviewer noted “confounding.” He said that he could not “figure out who was who in this impossibly complex story.”
This makes the film very much like “The Big Sleep,” which created a template for the detective film noir. “The Big Sleep” is also widely considered to be impossible to decipher, but completely enjoyable nevertheless.
Part of the difficulty in understanding the story line in this film is that even though Huggins adapted his own novel, and some of the scenes are lifted directly from the book, the story (according to a reviewer who had read the novel) has been speeded up and abbreviated and some of the names changed.
It doesn’t help that most of the women look extraordinarily alike. And most of them have multiple identities in the plot. One of the reviewers noted: “I thought the various babes were all the same person.” And, there are a lot of babes all with complicated histories.
Added to this is the fact that the two foreign husbands also looked just alike to me and their accents were indeterminate.
A number of the reviewers just could not accept Tome in the role of a smart mouthed, hardnosed detective. I have always thought Tome was an acquired taste, and he is truly dreadful in films which I suspect he detested.
(Note: There is one film he made with Joan Crawford, for example, where they had him dressed up in lederhosen.)
As one reviewer noted: “All the sweeping fedoras and dangling cigarettes in the world can't make Tone fit into this role.”
Tome always considered the business of film making as invasive to the private lives of the actors. He also felt that films required a totally different pace from theatre performances. I never saw him in a theatre performance, but I suspect he never quite felt comfortable with the film pace.
When he was married to Joan Crawford she (predictably) tried to take over promoting his career. Tome, however, was always more interested in theatre, even in small productions than film. It is thought that this difference between the two was one of the reasons for their divorce.
So, to me, Tome’s performances always have a “hostage” feel to them. I get the impression that he doesn’t really want to be where he is. But, he usually manages to pull off a credible performance.
When some heavies were beating up on Tone, I thought I saw Raymond Burr lurking on the sidelines. When the man spoke (he has about three lines) there was no mistaking it was Burr. This was an extremely small part and Burr would have been 31 at the time this film was made. So, he came into prominence a lot later in his life than I remembered.
All the prints of “I Love Trouble” were thought to have been lost for decades. A restored version of it was shown in a film festival in 2007, and I think this is the first time it has been shown on television (TCM). One reviewer snarked that this movie wouldn’t have received a second glance if it hadn’t been thought lost. I disagree. I think it is a fun romp even at two hours.
One of the other things I noticed in the film and then read comments about from other reviewers is the soundtrack. As one of the reviewers put it, the soundtrack tries way too hard to give the viewer advanced notice of the tone of the scene. The soundtrack tries to be “the star of the film.” It does signal lightheartedness, like when Bailey crawls out from under a bed where he has passed out and finds a beautiful babe in the bed. And it gives advance warning of danger. It seems to me that audiences in 1948 would have been too sophisticated for this. One of the reviewers thought that this soundtrack was so invasive and insulting he couldn’t watch the movie. But, for me, it faded into the background.
The film was well directed by S. Sylvan Simon. One of the reasons that name is not more familiar is that he died only three years after making the movie at the age of 41.
|Posted on July 24, 2020 at 2:40 PM|
PERFECT STRANGERS (1950)
Starring: Ginger Rogers, Dennis Morgan, Thelma Ritter, Margalo Gillmore, Anthony Ross and others.
I can’t say that Ginger Rogers is my favorite classic movie star, but she turned in some solid dramatic performances in addition to her song and dance movies with Fred Astaire. She’s not the most riveting actress, and I have to agree with the New York Times critic, Bosley Crowther, that she and Morgan were a bit “dreary” in this film, but it’s still a good watch.
In this courtroom drama, Rogers and Morgan are jurors in a murder case where a married man having an affair is on trial for killing his wife. Morgan who is married, and Rogers also fall in love and there is a parallel with the case.
This leaves a lot of room for debate about whether having an affair makes one a bad person and whether people can maintain a presumption of innocence in the face of bad behavior. There’s a lot of good courtroom material. Rogers and Morgan try not to be selected for the jury while Ritter wants to be selected to make some extra money. Margalo Gillmore plays a wealthy woman who has decided that the defendant is guilty because she doesn’t like his face. Thelma Ritter, playing her usual working class housewife, can’t make up her mind because she “wasn’t there.” I especially like the scene where the bailiff instructs a room full of silent jurors for the umpteenth time to not discuss the case. The minute he closes the door there is an immediate outburst of loud discussion.
It's a clever script idea based on a 1939 Ben Hecht – Charles MacArthur play “Ladies and Gentlemen.” The sequestered jury conceit is a good one and provides a platform for a lot of small parts like that of Thelma Ritter, and Margalo Gillmore. I also liked the character played by Anthony Ross. Ross is a man on the make, trying to move on Rogers. When he sees that Rogers has eyes only for Morgan, though, he straightens out and behaves like a friend. Like most things in the movies, it would be nice if life were actually like this. Ross, though, plays a totally convincing jerk and a totally convincing nice guy.
The movie doesn’t seem to have been a hit in 1950. Bosley Crowther described it as a “modest entertainment” and “an obviously hacked out affair which turns on a bit of terminal plotting that is flatly mechanical and contrived.”
If I had a criticism of the script it’s that Rogers and Morgan fall in love too quickly, but even so, I think it works.
Crowther considered the juror love affair and the domestic murder “the limits of plausibility” and “unmistakably stretched.” He also found Morgan and Rogers “dreary” but the fellow jurors “remarkably entertaining,” “the minor salvation.”
Among the minor salvations are the judge played by Paul Ford and Harry Bellaver as the Bailiff.