Dr. Christina J. Johns

lylajean

I Love Trouble (1947-48)

I LOVE TROUBLE (1947)


Starring Franchot Tone (43 at the time), Janet Blair, Adele Jergens and a small part for Raymond Burr.

Directed by S. Sylvan Simon.

Music by George Duning

Costumes (gowns) by Jean Louis


This is a long movie (2 hours) but well worth the watch. It is the studio’s try out of Franchot Tone’s for a private detective series. While Tone is usually fun to watch, I don’t think he has the same sort of edge as the noir detective Dick Powell had or the charm of William Powell.

As most of the reviewers point out, this script is straight out of the Chandler/Hammett line of novels with the suave, wisecracking detective, but it is well worth watching.


My favorite lines from the film are:

Heavy: This is a gun in your back.

Tone: Yeah, I’ve seen one before.


The filmscript was written by Roy Huggins and was based on his novel “The Double Take.” This same character, Stuart Bailey, was played years later by Efrem Zimalist Jr. in the television series 77 Sunset Strip.


Huggins created a number of the most famout TV movie series - Maverick, The Fugitive, The Rockford Files, and 77 Sunset Strip.


I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. I did, however, stop it at one point and noticed that there was an hour and 8 minutes more to go. I was surprised. Some of the reviewers criticized the movie for the length, but it held my attention throughout.


It’s a bit amazing that the film does hold the attention since the plot is as one reviewer noted “confounding.” He said that he could not “figure out who was who in this impossibly complex story.”


This makes the film very much like “The Big Sleep,” which created a template for the detective film noir. “The Big Sleep” is also widely considered to be impossible to decipher, but completely enjoyable nevertheless.


Part of the difficulty in understanding the story line in this film is that even though Huggins adapted his own novel, and some of the scenes are lifted directly from the book, the story (according to a reviewer who had read the novel) has been speeded up and abbreviated and some of the names changed.


It doesn’t help that most of the women look extraordinarily alike. And most of them have multiple identities in the plot. One of the reviewers noted: “I thought the various babes were all the same person.” And, there are a lot of babes all with complicated histories.

Added to this is the fact that the two foreign husbands also looked just alike to me and their accents were indeterminate.


A number of the reviewers just could not accept Tome in the role of a smart mouthed, hardnosed detective. I have always thought Tome was an acquired taste, and he is truly dreadful in films which I suspect he detested.


(Note: There is one film he made with Joan Crawford, for example, where they had him dressed up in lederhosen.)


As one reviewer noted: “All the sweeping fedoras and dangling cigarettes in the world can't make Tone fit into this role.”


Tome always considered the business of film making as invasive to the private lives of the actors. He also felt that films required a totally different pace from theatre performances. I never saw him in a theatre performance, but I suspect he never quite felt comfortable with the film pace.

When he was married to Joan Crawford she (predictably) tried to take over promoting his career. Tome, however, was always more interested in theatre, even in small productions than film. It is thought that this difference between the two was one of the reasons for their divorce.


So, to me, Tome’s performances always have a “hostage” feel to them. I get the impression that he doesn’t really want to be where he is. But, he usually manages to pull off a credible performance.

When some heavies were beating up on Tone, I thought I saw Raymond Burr lurking on the sidelines. When the man spoke (he has about three lines) there was no mistaking it was Burr. This was an extremely small part and Burr would have been 31 at the time this film was made. So, he came into prominence a lot later in his life than I remembered.


All the prints of “I Love Trouble” were thought to have been lost for decades. A restored version of it was shown in a film festival in 2007, and I think this is the first time it has been shown on television (TCM). One reviewer snarked that this movie wouldn’t have received a second glance if it hadn’t been thought lost. I disagree. I think it is a fun romp even at two hours.

One of the other things I noticed in the film and then read comments about from other reviewers is the soundtrack. As one of the reviewers put it, the soundtrack tries way too hard to give the viewer advanced notice of the tone of the scene. The soundtrack tries to be “the star of the film.” It does signal lightheartedness, like when Bailey crawls out from under a bed where he has passed out and finds a beautiful babe in the bed. And it gives advance warning of danger. It seems to me that audiences in 1948 would have been too sophisticated for this. One of the reviewers thought that this soundtrack was so invasive and insulting he couldn’t watch the movie. But, for me, it faded into the background.


The film was well directed by S. Sylvan Simon. One of the reasons that name is not more familiar is that he died only three years after making the movie at the age of 41.


Sources

Wikipedia, IMDB

Blog

Blog

The Painted Veil (1934) Part 2

Posted on September 23, 2020 at 6:40 PM

 

THE PAINTED VEIL (1934)

Part 2

 

Greta Garbo, Herbert Marshall, George Brent

 

Other versions:

• 1957 with Eleanor Parker (the Seventh Sin).

• 2006 with Naomi Watts.

 

Directed by Richard Boleslawski

 

Screenplay: John Meehan, Salka Viertel and Edith Fitzgerald

 

Based on the novel by Somerset Maugham (1925)

 

Film Editor: Hugh Wynn

 

Costumes by Adrian.

 

Garbo

 

During the early 20s, Garbo made an extraordinary amount money for the studio. Feeling her power, she fought for and gained more control over her roles after a contract dispute in 1925 and 1925.

I suppose we can assume then that she was a big part in choosing this role for herself. As I wrote in the Part 1, I think almost all of the energy of the production was invested in Garbo to the detriment of the two male leads (George Brent and Herbert Marshall)

 

Marshall and Brent

 

Herbert Marshall and George Brent are two of my favorite male actors of this era. I was astounded when I first started reading the reviews of “The Painted Veil” when contributors were criticizing their performances. Some of the reviewers also commented that they didn’t find either actor attractive and didn’t find believable that Garbo would be involved with either one of them.

 

Now, I find both men attractive, especially Brent, but as soon as I started watching the film, I understood what the detractors were talking about.

 

I am guessing that the men didn’t get the most careful treatment in the script, or in the direction. They both had some terrible (howler) lines and neither man seemed comfortable in the role.

 

George Brent

 

Cad, bounder, is not the usual role for George Brent. Brent played best the charming, handsome flirtatious man who loves women, truly appreciates them. My favorite of his movies are the ones he did with Bette Davis. There is just something about the way he looks at her, half-smiling that leads me to believe he genuinely enjoyed women.

 

But, in this role, he is a true cad. He is married, and seduces Garbo (who is married) consciously and methodically. When her husband finds out, he rather dutifully tells Garbo he’ll give up “everything” if she wants him to. He then reminds her that she will be giving up her reputation as well.

 

Garbo responds that he (Brent) knows full well that she would never ask him to give up everything and that’s why he’s offering to do it. That’s about it. Garbo runs out of the shop where they have met. In the next scene, she is already in inland cholera ridden China with Marshall.

 

I suspect that Brent was uncomfortable playing this “true cad” role and the director didn’t spend much time trying to help him work through it. I have a feeling that Brent (and Marshall) were treated like afterthoughts.

 

You get the feeling that Brent is walking his way through the performance, putting in a workmanlike job, but little more.

 

But then, I’m not sure what alternative he had. As I said, the lines were not very good, or believable. He’s a cad and therefore can’t be his true charming self. Whatever the problems were, him in this role just doesn’t work. One of the reviewers said that she thought Erroll Flynn might have done better, playing the role as a true charming snake. Brent just didn’t seem to be able to make the true “snake” work.

 

Herbert Marshall

 

Marshall made a career out of playing badly done-by husbands. One of the reviewers said that she liked that fact that in this movie he at least took some kind of revenge on the offending woman, Garbo. He tells Garbo that if Brent will marry her, he will let her go, but when Brent doesn’t step up to the plate Marshall has no problems dragging her off to a cholera-infested place in inland China. To be fair, he discovered them together in his own house, pretty tacky (as they say in the South).

 

Until the two finally reconcile, almost at the end of the film, Marshall is alternatively whiny and distracted (to Garbo) and outraged (to the Chinese.) After he finds out that Garbo hasn’t left the plague zone and is working with the local nuns, he reestablishes himself as a fairly nice character.

 

In the novel, we are given to understand that Marshall takes pleasure in forcing Garbo to go to inland China with him where there is a cholera epidemic. There is a subplot where both Garbo and Marshall decide to eat salad every night, a very risky thing to do. It is as if they are both in such despair that they are suicidal.

 

But, there is none of this in the film. At one point, when Marshall comes in late at night after tending to the epidemic, Garbo makes coffee for him in what looks like a lame dress, and says that she sees him “killing himself.” But, Marshall says that he’s not doing that.

 

While We’re on the Subject of Lame

 

Garbo’s costumes in this film are wonderful if you dispense with the usual quibbles about why she would be wearing a slinky lame dress in a shack in the middle of China in the middle of a plague. (Picky, picky). I would point out one exception and that is when she is at a garden party near the beginning when she and Marshall first arrive in China.

 

For some reason, she is wearing this white dress and a little hat that looks like a sailor’s hat with a little nib on top. The nib reminds me of that little thing that was on the top of a Brownie beanie when I was of the age to be wearing such a thing. It’s a truly ridiculous hat.

 

Location Shots

 

Several of the reviewers complained about the lack of location shooting in the film. The shots of China are obviously cloudy stock footage with the actors filmed in front of a screen. These same China scenes were evidently was used again in “The Good Earth.”

 

Budget and Temple Scene

 

The budget for this film was large for the time, but I’ll be damned if I can see what they spent it on. There is nothing extraordinary about the sets. The only audacious set is behind a dance performance that is supposedly taking place in a temple and is watched by Garbo and Brent. One reviewer commented that the scene looks like something out of a stereotyped street fair in Chinatown, San Francisco. It is pretty cheesy and largely unnecessary.

 

If I were editing the film, I would have cut this entire segment out. It only serves to give the audience some time with Garbo and Brent while Brent seduces her by telling her about China. It’s not worth it, though.

 

There were evidently other scenes, however, that were cut.

Some reviewers pointed out that audiences at the time thought many of the scenes in the beginning of the film were too long and were cut. These must have been scenes of Garbo’s family life before she marries Marshall. There are a lot of actors in the cast list that are recorded as “scenes deleted.”

 

This happy family situation portrayed in the film is hardly the situation in the novel. Garbo was not a sweet, if somewhat spinsterish, sister in a small town, bored and missing her recently married sister. In the novel, she was a high society Londonite, spoiled and shallow. These are two different characters. But, it’s Hollywood.

 

Minority Performances

 

I was going to write something about the man who played General Yu, but then found out that he was Swedish rather than Asian (Warner Oland). The woman who played Amah (Soo Yong) (1903-1984) was hawaiian and acted in “The Good Earth” (1937) and “Sayonara” (1957).

 

Supporting Actors

 

Walter Brennan is in the cast list, but it says that his scenes were deleted.

 

Forrester Harvey plays Waddington.

 


Categories: None

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

411 Comments

Reply Innoldill
10:43 AM on August 27, 2021 
https://buytadalafshop.com/ - buy cialis online
Reply Equassams
8:08 AM on August 30, 2021 
Reply Propecia
12:04 AM on September 1, 2021 
Cialis Propiedades
Reply Equassams
12:40 AM on September 1, 2021 
http://buystromectolon.com/ - ivermectin tablet
Reply AbollaCon
12:48 AM on September 1, 2021 
http://buypropeciaon.com/ - buy finasteride 1mg
Reply Queedge
12:13 AM on September 5, 2021 
Viagra
Reply cattEnlat
2:49 AM on September 5, 2021 
http://buysildenshop.com/ - best viagra site
Reply IMMIMOUND
12:19 AM on September 6, 2021 
ivermectin tablets buy online
Reply Stromectol
1:55 AM on September 6, 2021 
Viagra Kaufen Wirkung
Reply cattEnlat
6:14 AM on September 6, 2021 
Reply Propecia
1:29 PM on September 6, 2021 
Buy Sibustat Online
Reply Cialis
5:54 PM on September 6, 2021 
Levitra Professional 20mg
Reply Innoldill
7:28 AM on September 7, 2021 
Reply Stromectol
9:03 AM on September 7, 2021 
Generic Viagra And Cialis
Reply topical viagra cream
9:30 AM on September 7, 2021 
Cytotec Original 20mg
Reply nernern
12:11 PM on September 8, 2021 
Propecia
Reply nernern
5:27 AM on September 9, 2021 
Propecia
Reply can you buy cialis online
8:35 AM on September 9, 2021 
Zentel Quick Shipping
Reply itacelm
10:54 PM on September 9, 2021 
buy cialis with paypal
Reply AbollaCon
11:42 PM on September 9, 2021 
https://buypropeciaon.com/ - propecia finasteride
0